Mrs. Adebisi. |
By Olumide Agunbiade
An 87-year-old woman, Mrs. Sanusi Adebisi, has locked horns with the Union Bank Plc over the N253,000 withdrawn from her account in the bank via the Internet sometime in October 2013.
An 87-year-old woman, Mrs. Sanusi Adebisi, has locked horns with the Union Bank Plc over the N253,000 withdrawn from her account in the bank via the Internet sometime in October 2013.
The
claimant told the Magistrate’s Court sitting
at the Ojokoro, Agbado area of Lagos that she just got N200,000 of the sum from
her cooperatives to operate the tumour in her eye.
She told
the court that the tumour had worsened since the
scam took place because no longer had money to get rid of it.
Adebisi,
who sells drinks in Orile-Agege, said she had been the sole signatory to her
account since 1970s before her only daughter, Sanusi Ifedayo, was included as a
joint signatory due to a health problem.
Ifedayo
claimed she did not know anything about Internet transaction and told the court that she had rejected the use of an
ATM card for the account, but an official of the
bank insisted that she applied
for it, saying some amount could not be cashed across the counter.
“I had
withdrawn N40, 000 for Mama (mother) that day before the scam. It was my
husband who went to greet her that very day that noticed the debit alerts on
her phone.
I wrote a letter of complaint to the
bank and its officials promised
to investigate the matter. After a week, I was told that the money was
withdrawn online by an unknown person. I don’t even know how to operate a Facebook account not to talk of using
Internet for transaction. The
bank is in best position to tell
us what transpired,” she said.
She also
claimed that she had never revealed the ATM pin to anyone.
Add caption |
The
claimant’s counsel, Mr. Gbenga Julius, presented before the court, a signed and stamped printout
of his client’s statement of account reportedly accessed from the Union Bank – an exhibit the defence counsel, Mr.
Seyi Solaja, refuted.
Solaja
maintained that the exhibit was not the same as the one the bank issues to its customers, adding that
it was null and void under Section 84 of Evidence Act.
The
magistrate, Mrs. T. Akani adjourned the case to July 27, 2014 for further
hearing.
Source:Punch
Source:Punch
No comments:
Post a Comment